Symposium
Report Sections
Introduction
Dr. Marty's Speech
Socratic Dialogue
Morning Session
mprQuestions
Afternoon Session
mprBusiness Group
mprEducation Group
mprPros and Cons
mprEffects
The Should Statements
Symposium Participants
Symposium and Report Credits
About the Public Religion Project
Religion in
Everyday Life
Civic Journalism Initiative
|
|
The Education
Group
The Education Group In public education, at least, the educators who
participated in the symposium agreed that religion is deeply hidden if
not invisible. As an example, one described the absurdity of trying to
teach about the Civil Rights Movement without referring to religion -
at best a terrible distortion of history, but a compromise teachers feel
they must make. Schools must strike a new balance, they agreed, and teach
about religion's influence on history, literature, and other disciplines.
At the same time, they also agreed that public schools and teachers must
scrupulously avoid endorsing any particular religious creed. Educators
saw this as an exceedingly delicate issue; where schools have tried to
teach about religion, it has proved to be quite controversial. In framing
the questions they brought to the larger assembly, educators touched upon
a variety of other topics:
- Artificially excluding religion from education damages integrity because
schools do not teach students the whole truth.
- Educators saw public schools as a vitally important public space,
one of a very few where people of all backgrounds and walks of life
meet and converse. They saw an urgent need to reclaim this public space
as as an acceptable place to discuss religion.
- Excluding religion from public schools allows zealots to dominate
public discussion. We have, in effect, abdicated public discussion of
one part of our lives to those who would speak loudest. Bringing religion
out of the shadows might take away their power and their ability to
use religion as negative force.
- Because it imparts our culture's values, stories, and history to the
next generation, education is inherently religious.
Lying behind this discussion was the fear that educators would be punished
and lose their jobs for bringing religion into public schools. Who, teachers
asked, will support them? Who will come to their aid when they are (inevitably)
attacked? Or will they simply be fired - as they have been in the past? |